If we can't specify perfection, is the perfect specification one that allows for the true complexity of building something?

This could look something like:

Outlining the values and aspirations of the project that have brought together everyone involved.
Clear channels for feedback and to develop the 'how' of building, and implementing changes.
Names roles and strengths of the people involved, and how the relate to each other.
Opportunities for unexpected input.
A framework for relating to each other to inspire change and growth as skilled individuals and humans.

Of course, this assumes that there is something aspirational about the project. It assumes that people are open to learning, changing and improving. That people are able to recognise and value diversity of experience and skill.

Writing a better specification for a better project.

Welcome to my little corner of the internet.

I believe that place matters.

Our connection to whatever little corner of the planet we find ourselves in, or choose to place ourselves on, matters.

I'm relentlessly curious and continually learning.

My interests are scattered across topics including property, strategy, acoustics, psychology, theology, systems theory, quantum physics and leadership. I read, listen, watch, and learn about whatever grabs my attention in the moment.

This is a learning experiment.

I come here to try to make sense of something I’ve come across, by writing about it.

I’m immersing myself in a new language.

I’m learning to speak Te Reo Māori, the language of the indigenous people of Aotearoa New Zealand and one of our official languages. After spending 2020 studying, I’m figuring out how to keep the journey going outside the classroom.

You’re welcome to follow along.